Why Major Contractors Struggle to Scale Local Supplier Engagement
August 31, 2025

Major contractors are finding new ways to scale local supplier engagement—designing smarter packages and creating lasting value.

Across Australia and New Zealand, local participation is becoming central to how major projects are judged — not just by regulators, but by clients, investors, and communities. Governments are setting clearer expectations, industries are broadening their sourcing networks, and suppliers are investing to meet higher standards of safety, quality, and ESG performance.

For major contractors, this creates a strong opportunity: to convert policy into delivery by developing supplier ecosystems that are capable, compliant, and connected to local economies. When that happens, project outcomes improve, delivery risks reduce, and community value grows in parallel.

1. What Makes Scaling Local Engagement Complex

The challenge: the mechanics of scale. Large delivery programs move fast, span multiple jurisdictions, and rely on consistent systems to maintain assurance. Within that environment, five realities shape how local engagement takes place:

  • Package size and design often determine which suppliers can participate. Breaking work into practical scopes opens access for more capable local firms.
  • Supplier data and onboarding need to flow across multiple client systems. Streamlined data collection and recognition across frameworks accelerate mobilisation.
  • Cash flow and payment terms influence supplier confidence. Clear, predictable terms help smaller firms invest in capability and deliver reliably.
  • Timing of engagement matters. Involving suppliers during planning and mobilisation allows better alignment on resources, safety, and logistics.
  • Evolving policy settings across states mean requirements vary by project. Staying current and integrating reporting into delivery systems prevents rework and ensures compliance.

These are delivery challenges, not barriers. With the right systems and partnerships, they become opportunities to strengthen both performance and local impact.

3. How Leading Contractors are Closing The Gap

Across industries, the most effective delivery teams are reframing local supplier engagement as part of core program execution. A few practices stand out:

Design procurement for participation

Early market soundings and regional capability scans help define packages that match supplier capacity. Sharing information early gives businesses time to prepare, align certifications, and plan resources.

Simplify onboarding and compliance


A single supplier evidence pack aligned to national prequalification and client frameworks reduces duplication and builds confidence in data accuracy.

Create payment models that support delivery


Prompt, transparent payment practices strengthen supplier reliability and reputation across the program.

Engage suppliers before mobilisation


When suppliers are brought into design and mobilisation planning, the result is smoother ramp-up, clearer communication, and faster readiness.

Treat participation as a delivery metric


Tracking local, Indigenous, and SME participation alongside cost, quality, and schedule embeds accountability and ensures outcomes are visible to all stakeholders.

4. What Effective Management Looks Like

Strong local supplier engagement shows up in project delivery. It looks like:

  • Work packages designed to reflect regional capability.
  • Prequalified local suppliers ready for mobilisation.
  • Data systems that connect supplier, client, and regulator requirements.
  • Cash-flow certainty that supports performance and growth.
  • Transparent dashboards showing measurable progress and community outcomes.

These elements are increasingly becoming part of how clients and governments define value in delivery partnerships.

Final Thought

Scaling local supplier engagement is about building the ecosystems that make long-term delivery stronger. As programs expand across infrastructure, transport, energy, and construction, the ability to integrate local suppliers effectively will define both performance and legacy.

Related Insights

News Cover
November 2, 2025
How Public-Private Programs Are Rewriting Procurement

PPPs are shifting procurement from transaction to transformation. Here’s how collaboration is reshaping value and delivery.

News Cover
October 26, 2025
What the Next Decade of Supply Chains Looks Like in ANZ

The decade ahead will redefine supply chains across Australia and New Zealand, driven by data integration, capability, and regional resilience.

News Cover
October 19, 2025
How Clients Are Reassessing Supplier Value Beyond Cost & Capability

Supplier value is now defined by innovation, sustainability and resilience—here’s how clients are changing their approach.

News Cover
October 12, 2025
3 Common Blind Spots in Supplier Oversight

Supplier oversight gaps often appear where visibility seems strongest—here are three areas that deserve closer attention.

News Cover
October 5, 2025
The Cost of Ignoring Early Supplier Warning Signals

Early supplier warning-signals often mark the difference between proactive delivery and costly disruption.

News Cover
September 28, 2025
5 Global Trends Reshaping Supplier Ecosystems in 2026

Five global trends reshaping supplier ecosystems in 2026—a new era of data, resilience, and value across delivery networks.

Icon
Icon
This communication is provided for informational and general reference purposes only. It does not constitute legal, procurement, compliance, or commercial advice, nor should it be relied upon as a substitute for formal consultation with qualified professionals. Galloway & Pierce makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, as to the accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of the information presented, and accepts no liability for loss or damage arising from reliance on the materials provided. This communication may include commentary, analysis, or interpretation based on publicly available information, supplier data, regulatory trends, or third-party sources believed to be reliable at the time of publication. Galloway & Pierce does not independently verify the accuracy of all such third-party data and assumes no responsibility for errors, omissions, or updates that may arise thereafter. Any opinions expressed represent the professional views of the authors at the time of writing and may be subject to change without notice. Nothing in this communication should be interpreted as an endorsement, certification, or recommendation of any supplier, business entity, technology platform, strategy, or operational approach unless explicitly stated. Examples provided are illustrative only and do not reflect actual client results unless otherwise specified. Galloway & Pierce does not provide investment advice, legal representation, or regulated financial services. Our firm does not act as an agent or fiduciary on behalf of any specific client unless explicitly contracted to do so through a signed agreement. Any mention of supplier diversity classifications, ESG metrics, or compliance frameworks is informational and does not constitute a formal assessment or audit. Clients, suppliers, and readers are expected to conduct their own due diligence and seek appropriate guidance before acting on any information contained herein. Any reliance on this communication is at the recipient’s own risk. This material may not be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including electronic, mechanical, photocopying, or recording, without the prior written consent of Galloway & Pierce. Receipt and review of this content constitutes your agreement not to distribute or reuse its contents without authorization.
Back your procurement with a Performance Engine.
Let's drive smarter, faster, more inclusive outcomes.